I have been exploring this concept of re-inventing collaborating in the office environment for quite a while because it bugs me the way we treat each other. Office Managers and their bosses, designers--professional or amateur inhouse resources, furniture and fixtures sales people and the cleaning providers, all treat each other with benign suspicion. So we stick to what we know and play it safe instead of smart.
Why can't we be passionate about the office environment as an incubator for productivity instead of a sterile, unimaginative and cold place? Why do we spend oddles on money on furnishings and stuff that ends up cutting creativity and interaction? Why do we spend a lot of money on office renovations and then pretend that it makes sense to let it deteriorate without planned maintenance or give it over to the lowest bidder? Why do design, installers, and cleaners let this go on unchallenged? Is this what your business image is worth?
(My inspiration for this rant came from an article I read a few years ago and just came across again by blogger Paul Graham. You should read this--especially his middle section on Workplaces if you are responsible in any way for designing, operating, maintaining or cutting the checks for office environments. It will challenge your paradigms.) If I ever get sucked into working with clients in this kind of interchange I will either fire the client or myself. Life is too short!
In the terminology of office services the "office" is a real focus, but the "service"??!!? ...not so much. The work that B2B service companies do has been largely relegated to packaging and processing perceived value without any real relationship of real value. I have had several negative experiences in the last two months getting "service" from our copier supplier Pitney Bowes. This experience is because of two factors:
- ServiceMaster specified the acquisition as a "necessary-evil" transaction with walls to a meaningful, problem-solving relationship (our fault, which will become clear below)
- Pitney Bowes has acquiesed to impersonal sales and service. We have had three sales reps from this company in the last 8 months, none of whom seemed to know our buying history and whose sales script was nicely packaged and full of "bloat-ware" jargon.
When we enter service with each other as a "necessary-evil" we think we are protecting ourselves in a guarded, "Win-Lose" negotiation. What we end up with is ALWAYS going to be "Lose-Lose."
"Win-Lose" = "Lose-Lose"
Purchases avoid reality and hold their cards to their vest and choose the best contract from a group of providers who all guessed at the real needs and prayed they were right. Providers do not get the best knowledge about the context and impact of service. Answers to problem-solving questions come from clients like, "its all in the RFP," or "your the expert, you tell us."
Providers act guardedly as well, trying to calculate risk in "wasting time" with the prospect based on how likely they are to buy who end up choosing from a list of suppliers who gave it their best guess. Answers to implementation questions come from providers like, "that feature isn't available on the package you bought, it costs extra" or my favorite--"Jane Smith doesn't work for us any longer and your file information is incomplete, but I would love to have you new consultant come and visit you to get a clear picture of your needs." OUCH!!!
When I have received tremendous service in the past it has been for only two reasons--and 9.5 times out of 10 they are connected--and they are 1.) the environment was set up for success for both parties and b.) the parties were brilliantly prepared for and enjoyed creating results.
I remember having lunch last October with three of my ServiceMaster colleagues at The Keg restaurant in west Toronto. They were regulars and on a first name basis with the host and the server. I got a lesson in what it means to serve. The whole operation of "lunch" was set up to deliver a relaxing flow of comfort, humour, suggestion, anticipation of need, sensory fulfilment, accuracy, superb quality, satiation and candour about the quality of the experience for them. How is this a model?
Both parties were well prepared in advance of the interaction with a common value of quality, time and cost of service that would exactly meet the needs of purchasers while providing for the growth of the provider. The casualness in the relationship was based not on laxness, on the contrary; it was based on the absolute commitment by the entire service system to deliver value. Both parties relished the interchange and the evaluation of service afterwards. Measurement of each transaction provided the truth in the moment that ensures trust in the relationship and continuous improvement.
If you want an office environment that is always clean, comfortable and productive these values are critical. We would love to be a part of your service ecosystem to deliver an Open Source office service.



